123Fab #22

1 topic, 2 key figures, 3 startups to draw inspiration from

Towards CO2 Capture

”The deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is not optional if the world hopes to meet the targets set out in the Paris Climate Agreement”, stated recently the International Energy Agency. Carbon Capture and Storage is a technology that can capture up to 90% of the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions produced from the use of fossil fuels in electricity generation and industrial processes, preventing the CO2 from entering the atmosphere, or removing the CO2 that already reached the atmosphere. The CCS chain consists of three parts: capture, transport and storage of carbon dioxide emissions. In this newsletter, we will focus on the carbon capture segment exclusively.

There are two types of carbon capture methods: CO2 can either be captured at its source (power plants, industrial processes) and then stored in non-atmospheric reservoirs or it can be removed from the atmosphere (e.g. with forests). Most technologies fall into the first segment. In the context of increasing ecological awareness, interest in carbon sequestration has grown as capture could achieve 14% of the global greenhouse gas emissions reductions needed by 2050.

The main sources of CO2 containment that need to be tackled are the following:

• Natural Gas extraction: 10 to 20% of the CO2 contained in natural gas needs to be extracted before any usage – represents 73% of the industrial CO2 captured
• Hydrogen production: a lot of CO2 is produced during the steam reforming production process –  represents 18% of the industrial CO2 captured
• Biogas: up to 50% of CO2 needs to be extracted to have a proper quality after biogas production

Carbon capture technologies separate CO2 from other gases by one of these three methods:

1. Pre-combustion capture: it removes CO2 from fossil fuels before combustion is completed, through processes such as gasification (converts carbon-based materials by reaction at high temperature into synthesis gas) or reforming (converts carbon-based materials by reaction with water to produce synthesis gas, hydrogen or carbon monoxide). The Caledonia Clean Energy Project in the UK (due for the mid-2020s) will use gasification to capture more than 90% of the carbon emitted from a natural gas power plant.
2. Post-combustion capture: it removes diluted CO2 (~5-15% CO2 concentration) from the flue gases once the fuel has been fully burned within the air. R&D efforts in post-combustion capture are focused on sorbents, membrane systems, and also novel concepts (e.g. hybrid systems that efficiently combine attributes from multiple key technologies). The Petra Nova project in Texas is the largest post-combustion capture solution and removes 92% of the CO2 from the plant.
3. Oxy-fuel combustion systems: fossil fuels are combusted in a nearly pure oxygen environment, as opposed to air. The main purpose of using oxy-fuel combustion is to generate flue gas with very high concentrations of CO2 and water vapor, making it possible to separate or capture the CO2 from the flue gas purely by low-temperature dehydration and desulfurization processes. Air Liquide is taking part in several large-scale research projects in Europe and in North America, testing oxy-fuel combustion processes, such as the Lacq Project in the south of France where Air Liquide will supply TOTAL with oxygen at a rate of 240 tonnes per day.

Carbon capture is technically feasible and has existed for 40 years. Nearly two dozen commercial-scale carbon capture projects are operating around the world and 22 more are underway. For instance, since 2017, the ADM Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture & Storage Project has been capturing CO2 from an ethanol production facility and sequestering it in a nearby deep saline formation. The project can capture up to 1.1 million tons of CO2 per year.

Although carbon capture is feasible, there are economic reasons that explain its limited adoption. Most CCS applications are currently not economically viable and there is a lack of government policies to support the technology. Two changes would be required for CCS to become economically viable in those categories. First, the cost of carbon capture must come down, either through the development of new technologies or through scale and experience effects. Second, the value of captured CO2 emissions must increase, through new uses and sources of demand. The carbon tax could accelerate its adoption if it is high enough to be binding (as in Norway) or if there is a post-capture carbon market (as in the US where petrol companies buy carbon to increase their productivity, although this example is not a very eco-friendly approach). In France, on the contrary, the carbon tax is too low compared to the high investments that require carbon capture.

Yet, more and more startups are positioning themselves in this segment and are raising funds. In June 2020, Climeworks, a Swiss climate startup, raised 73 million Swiss francs ($76 million) in a private funding round. It builds machines that capture CO2 from the air and store it in a solid-state underground. It also takes the CO2 and delivers it to industrial clients, such as The Coca-Cola Company, to put bubbles in drinks.

Finally, with regard to its environmental impact, attention should be drawn to the need to use additional fossil fuels for carbon capture solutions. The use of CCS with renewable biomass is one of the few carbon abatement technologies that can be used in a ‘carbon-negative’ mode.

All in all, the carbon capture market has existed for half a decade, but the timing seems right. Plans for more than 30 new integrated CCUS facilities have been announced since 2017 and many startups are addressing this market as well. Furthermore, the trend in CCS investment is on the rise. On September 1st, 2020, the U.S. Department of Energy announced the award of approximately $72 million in federal funding to support the development and advancement of carbon capture technologies.

2 Key Figures

56 Carbon Capture startups

in the world registered by Crunchbase

Market size expected to reach $6.1bn by 2027

The global carbon Capture market size was valued at $1.8bn in 2019 and is expected to reach $6.1bn by 2024.

3 startups to draw inspiration from

This week, we identified three startups that we can draw inspiration from: SeeO2, Climeworks and C-Capture.

SeeO2

See O2 Energy is a Canadian startup working to efficiently convert carbon dioxide and water into marketable and clean value-added products using reversible fuel cell technology. This solution makes it possible to effectively capture and use carbon to produce fuels, power, heat, and oxygen.

Climeworks

Climeworks is a spin-off company that develops a carbon dioxide reclaiming system. Its product extracts carbon dioxide from ambient air. It builds three models based on the amount of CO2 extracted. Its chief target markets are F&B companies that use CO2 for aeration in food processing and greenhouse owners. It also intends to enable the creation of carbon-neutral synthetic fuels using extracted CO2.

C-Capture

C-Capture, a spin-off from the University of Leeds, developed a bottom-up approach to design solvent systems for the removal of CO2 from gas streams. The patented technology captures CO2 from methane gas streams as it passes through and upgrades biogas. Reversibly captures carbon dioxide from power stations, steel and cement production, and fermentation units.

123Fab #21

1 topic, 2 key figures, 3 startups to draw inspiration from

 Is the Spotify of transport going to emerge?

The number of means of transport is increasing in large cities. In addition to traditional options such as private cars and public transport, new mobility operators are flourishing: shared bikes, electric scooters, carpooling, ride-hailing, free-floating electric cars, etc. As each operator provides its own application or platform, it has fragmented the reservation and ticketing platforms, paving the way for new multimodal platforms or aggregators that benefit all counterparts (users, mobility services providers, public transport companies, cities, etc.). This is how the expression “Mobility-as-a-Service” came about. According to MaaS Alliance, Mobility-as-as-a-Service puts users at the core of transport services, offering them tailor-made mobility solutions based on their individual needs.

MaaS platforms support commuters every step of their journey without them having to switch from one service provider to another. One of MaaS’s main strengths is that it offers several multimodal routes, optimized according to your preferences: the cheapest, the fastest, the fewest number of connections, the least crowded, etc. As the Mobility-as-a-Service sector is projected to reach $158 billion by 2024, it has aroused the interest of a wide range of mobility players (mobility operators, enablers, services companies, etc.). Large corporates are also investing in this market, as we saw recently with the acquisition of Moovit by Intel Corporation in May 2020 for around $900m. Moovit is known for its application that allows travelers to plan their trip by combining public transport, bikes and scooter services, carpooling and car sharing.

MaaS offers can be divided into 4 levels of integration:

• Route planning combining several modes of transport, personalized according to user preferences and real-time traffic
• Route planning + ticketing for multi-operator ticket distribution
• Route planning + ticketing + pricing consolidating the pricing systems of several operators into all-inclusive mobility packages and customer acquisition mechanisms
• Fully integrated: route planning + ticketing + pricing + incentives promoting green transport, off-peak travel and redistribution of city and employer subsidies

In this newsletter, we will focus on fully integrated solutions exclusively to examine whether it is a sustainable segment.

Among the startups reaching the 4th level of integration, Whim is the most advanced. It is an application that combines all existing transport services into a single subscription. There are 4 different categories of subscriptions, ranging from pay-as-you-go to an all-inclusive monthly subscription. Initially launched in Helsinki, Whim is now available in Birmingham, Antwerp, Vienna (not all options) and will soon be available in Greater Tokyo and Singapore. Zipster is almost its equivalent in Singapore, launched in 2020. Via Zipster users can plan their multimodal journeys, pay for public and private transport and get Grab vouchers.

Although these applications aim to become the Spotify of transport, are they feasible and sustainable? For Whim, becoming the Spotify of transport seems to be a myth for two major reasons:

• Firstly, its business model is hardly sustainable. As with streaming platforms (Spotify or Netflix), you can either pay-as-you-go or choose an unlimited subscription at €4.99/month, but unlike streaming platforms, the marginal costs for a journey are quite high (from €1 per 30-minute bike ride to €10 per 5km taxi ride). Moreover, all-inclusive pricing encourages users to choose modes of transport that are convenient but very costly to operate. In addition, the on-demand public transport coverage needs to be high to get users to sign up. However, it is a sustainable option when it covers fixed needs such as commuting trips or first- and last-mile connectivity.
• Another barrier to relevant MaaS offerings is the need for public transport data. Access to commuter data is essential for public and private players to understand how people travel, identify market gaps and adapt services and products accordingly. For instance, The New South Wales Government has made transport data publicly available to encourage innovation.

Although the market for fully integrated MaaS platforms is not yet mature, MaaS players can help cities achieve their goals, whether it is congestion, pollution, inclusion or resident well-being. In the same way, MaaS players need cities. Building a fully integrated MaaS offer requires continuous innovation, public-private partnerships, and support from the authorities (from integration into public infrastructures, to subsidies and incentives). In an ideal world, startups with the freedom to innovate and the flexibility to adapt can provide technological solutions to help transport authorities improve infrastructure and services.

In conclusion, optimal MaaS platforms do not yet exist and the Spotify for transport – i.e. MaaS by subscription – seems unlikely. Yet, it is a fast-growing market that involves an increasing number of players. The question of whether the driving force behind the initiative is private players or the state remains open.

2 Key Figures

106 MaaS startups

in the world registered by Crunchbase

Market size expected to reach $158bn by 2024

The global MaaS market size was valued at $24bn in 2019 and is expected to reach $158bn by 2024.

3 startups to draw inspiration from

This week, we identified three startups that we can draw inspiration from: Whim, Immense and Betterway.

Whim

Whim is an internationally awarded Finnish mobility application that allows you to book and pay for all your trips one trip at a time or with a convenient seasonal order. Whim has already made more than 16 million trips.

Immense

The Immense platform enables you to rapidly test the important strategic and operational decisions for global transportation in the digital world – taking away the risk of expensive assumptions and sunk costs.

Betterway

Betterway is the leading platform for enterprise mobility management. Like the transport refund, you can now set up the “Forfait mobilité durable”. It allows your employees to use their personal bicycles or to buy one, to use car-sharing or car-pooling solutions and even to use mobility with free access in the street.

123Fab #21

1 topic, 2 key figures, 3 startups to draw inspiration from

Low-carbon materials: a necessary transition in the construction industry

“The state of the building stock in Europe will make or break the European Green Deal”, said Adrian Joyce, Secretary General of the European Alliance of Companies for Energy Efficiency in Buildings. Indeed, buildings account for 19% of global greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions.

Construction materials account for 40% of the CO2 from buildings. This is due to 2 main factors: the overexploitation of raw material resources and/or the exploitation of polluting resources and the extensive use of energy-intensive components during their production phase. Cement is one of the main construction materials along with steel and accounts for 8% of the global CO2 emissions, which leads to the exploration for sustainable building materials. Low-carbon materials such as carbon concrete or wood fiber are a promising alternative. They are made using a waste-free production process and an energy and carbon-efficient production, assembly and transportation process.

Different technologies are being tested and developed:

• Short- and medium-term solutions: recycling and carbon compensation. An example of recycled industrial waste is high-density blocks which are made up of a mixture of lime fly ash and stone crusher dust. However, the cost and effort to recycle these materials remains high. Carbon capture solutions are also another way to decarbonize materials. Although this technology is premature today and not yet economically proven, it can capture carbon dioxide waste and prevent it from escaping into the atmosphere.
• Long-term solutions: substitution by new low-carbon materials. Low-carbon concrete appears to be a good way forward, as concrete will remain the most widely used building material in the coming years. Decarbonization of concrete means decarbonization of cement. Cement containing a high volume of one or more complementary cementing materials (CCM) (such as coal fly ash, granulated slag, silica fume and reactive rice-husk ash) is a promising alternative to clinker for reducing CO2 emissions. Extensive R&D is underway to use CCM in cement in Portland, and studies highlight that it could reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the global cement production by up to 80%. Many startups (e.g. CarbonCure, Carbon Clean Solutions, LanzaTech) are positioning themselves on this segment.
• Another alternative is bio-based materials. They are made up from substances derived from living organisms and can be used in many applications in the construction sector such as for insulation (vegetable fiber wools, straw bales, etc.). Some technologies create a material directly by mixing and compacting different bio-material parts (wood fiber, beams, posts, etc.), while others add customer polymer to the wood and plant fiber to make the material more resistant. However, there is still some reluctance towards bio-based materials, as they have not been shown to be comparable to their traditional counterparts (performance, ease of use, cost, etc.).

Although low-carbon alternatives are growing, there are significant barriers to their adoption, which explains why concrete and other high polluting materials are still widely used:

• The reluctance of major players to change: the key manufacturers who dominate the materials industry are slow to experiment or change business models. Architects, engineers, contractors, and clients are also cautious about the use of new building materials.
• Technical considerations related to the low-carbon transition: technologies such as carbon capture, use and storage, or the production of hydrogen-based metallurgical processes, have been demonstrated but are not yet commercially available.
• Cost of investing in new, low-carbon technologies and processes: the investment required for heavy industries, such as steel and cement, could be up to 60% higher than current levels.

Low-carbon materials still have a long way to go before they become a mature market, but there is reason for optimism. The transition to a low-carbon materials industry will be supported next year by the launch of a platform on the London Metal Exchange for the trading of low-carbon aluminium, mostly produced with renewable energy. This is the first time a metal will be traded based on its environmental footprint in the exchange’s 143-year history.

2 Key Figures

112 low-carbon materials startups

in the world

Market size expected to reach $377bn by 2022

According to Allied Market Research, the global low-carbon building materials market size was valued at $171bn in 2015 and is expected to reach $377bn by 2022.

3 startups to draw inspiration from

This week, we identified three startups that we can draw inspiration from: Carbon Clean, Woodoo and Kenoteq.

Carbon Clean

Based in London, Carbon Clean Solutions (CCS) provide carbon dioxide (CO2) separation technologies used for industrial and gas treating applications.

Woodoo

Based in Paris, Woodoo’s technology offers a second life to low-grade wood by transforming it through green processes into a waterproof, fire-resistant and highly performative material.

Kenoteq

Based in the UK, Kenoteq offers an unfired building eco-brick, K-Briq, made from 90% recycled construction materials and demolition waste.

123Fab #20

1 topic, 2 key figures, 3 startups to draw inspiration from

The digitization of Human Resources

The Covid-19 pandemic and the resulting lockdown period have redefined work patterns and employee behavior. With remote working becoming the new norm during lockdown, the number of remote workers has significantly increased. While 30% of employees surveyed worked remotely at least part of the time before the pandemic, Gartner analysis reveals that post-pandemic, 41% of employees are likely to work remotely at least some of the time. Other trends resulting from the current situation are also reshaping HR management, such as the increased focus on employee well-being and safety, the increase in contingent work, and the increased focus on employee engagement and productivity data.

These trends have forced HR teams to rethink corporate hiring, performance, experience, and management strategies, primarily through the adoption of integrated talent management software systems. If the digitization of HR is not something new, the pandemic has certainly accelerated a profound transformation in the way large companies convey their culture and values and ensure knowledge transfer.

The integration of digital tools into HR management has 3 main benefits for companies: 1) the automation of processes, reducing the time spent by HR teams on repetitive tasks 2) an enhanced employee experience, increasing employee satisfaction and well-being 3) the opportunity to use this freed-up time to rethink corporate HR strategies.

Covid-19 has created new business opportunities for HR tech startups that are now positioned in 4 fields:

• Digital employee onboarding, cross-boarding, and off-boarding: digital onboarding tools are a great solution to save time on administrative topics, engage employees through personalized integration journeys, and accelerate employee learning curves.
• Digital employee training and knowledge transmission: companies can transmit employee knowledge and skills through digital soft skill peer-to-peer coaching tools for white-collar workers and AR/VR training for blue-collar workers.
• Real-time employee engagement monitoring: companies can track employee performance and engagement through data processing and AI to improve productivity and employee well-being.
• Digital hiring tools, powered with AI to match candidate profiles and shortlist resumes based on the required skills, roles, and expertise level.

The integration of Artificial Intelligence into HR processes appears promising, especially to hire, engage, and retain candidates and employees. Yet, the technology has not reached its full potential and effective applications are still very limited: AI algorithms are still struggling to effectively match human skills to job descriptions because they do not fully capture and understand the human parameters and specifics of hiring standards.

2 Key Figures

1,549 HR tech startups

in the world, according to AngelList

Market size expected to reach $10bn by 2022

According to Markets and Markets, the global HR software market size was valued at $6.5bn in 2017 and is expected to reach $10bn by 2022.

3 startups to draw inspiration from

This week, we identified three startups that we can draw inspiration from: Carbon Clean, Woodoo and Kenoteq.

365talents

365talents is a French startup that develops an artificial intelligence SaaS solution for HR management including strategic workforce planning, internal talent marketplace and upskilling.

Skillup

Skillup is considered as the new Tripadvisor for professional training hosting over 20k training sessions, aiming to help HR services to find the adequate training for employees.

Zapitc

Based in the UK, Zaptic is a startup that creates a connected worker platform providing job instructions for frontline operation teams.

123Fab #19

1 topic, 2 key figures, 3 startups to draw inspiration from

Green Hydrogen – Water Electrolysis for a greener future

Hydrogen (H2), alongside renewables and natural gas, could play a key role in the energy transition by fostering the decarbonization of industries, with the versatility to provide mobility, power systems, heat and industrial services. Substituting polluting fossil fuels with hydrogen — which emits water only when burned – could significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and stave off climate change.

Although hydrogen is a very low-carbon energy, it does not exist naturally on earth and is mainly produced from a range of more or less environmentally friendly chemical sources and processes. There are commonly three types of hydrogen: grey, blue and green.

• Grey hydrogen is produced by chemical reactions – steam methane reforming and coal gasification – and by the use of carbon-intensive fossil fuels (natural gas, oil and coal).
• Blue hydrogen is produced the same way as grey hydrogen, but the main difference is that it has a lower carbon footprint. This is because hydrogen uses carbon capture technologies that prevent the release of CO2 and allow the captured carbon to be stored and reused in industrial processes. Blue hydrogen is more expensive than grey hydrogen.
• Green hydrogen is produced by the electrolysis of water, which uses an electric current to break apart water molecules (H2O) into hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2). If the electrolysis is realized using renewable electricity (solar PV or offshore wind turbines), the resulting hydrogen is the cleanest variety, producing zero carbon emissions.

The global hydrogen production is dominated by grey hydrogen: according to the International Energy Agency (IEA), 96% of the hydrogen manufactured in the world is “grey”, while less than 0.1% is produced by water electrolysis. This is mainly due to the lower price of grey hydrogen production compared to blue and green hydrogen. The IEA estimates the price of grey hydrogen at around €1.50 per kilo – the main cause being the price of fossil fuels – and between €3.50 and €5 per kilo for green hydrogen. The three most critical factors for the high cost of green hydrogen are 1) the limited and costly capacity of electrolysis at the moment, 2) the high price of green electricity used in the electrolysis process and 3) the costs for safe and clean transportation.

The widespread adoption of green hydrogen remains extremely slow, but the future of clean H2 could be bright. Major players are taking action to stimulate R&D around green hydrogen production, transportation and industrial applications. The European Commission, for instance, strongly believes in the prospective use of green hydrogen to decarbonize heavy industries and transportation, as demonstrated by the adoption of the European Green Deal in January 2020 to support innovation in clean hydrogen and low-carbon resources. The Covid-19 crisis has introduced a new impetus: France and Germany plan to collaborate and invest €7bn and €9bn respectively in green hydrogen R&D projects. Large corporate companies, including Shell, Airbus and Chevron, are also seizing the opportunity to invest in clean hydrogen technologies and applications.

The market is still extremely young, and there is still room for progress. Startups are positioning themselves either in the improvement of hydrogen storage, transportation and distribution, or in the development of new applications (fuel cells for vehicles, industrial use cases), or in the development of new alternatives for H2 production and electrolysis methods (such as alkaline, Polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) or solid oxide electrolysis).

2 Key Figures

645 hydrogen fuel startups

in the world, according to Startup Insights

Market size expected to reach $2.28bn by 2027

According to PRNewswire, the global green hydrogen market size was valued at $787 million in 2019 and is expected to reach $2.28bn by 2027.

3 startups to draw inspiration from

This week, we identified three startups that we can draw inspiration from: Enapter, Hyon and PowerUP Energy Technologies.

Enapter

Based in Germany, Enapter makes highly efficient green hydrogen generators with scalable electrolysers (Anion Exchange Membrane) to replace fossil fuels.

Hyon

Hyon is a Sweden-based startup that develops and delivers turn-key solutions for the complete hydrogen value chain, from production to utilization, for the maritime sector.

PowerUp Technologies

PowerUP is a US startup that provides clean and portable energy by delivering a hydrogen fuel cell backup generator solution, which can be used for various use cases in transportation.

123Fab #18

1 topic, 2 key figures, 3 startups to draw inspiration from

Green Hydrogen – Water Electrolysis for a greener future

Hydrogen (H2), alongside renewables and natural gas, could play a key role in the energy transition by fostering the decarbonization of industries, with the versatility to provide mobility, power systems, heat and industrial services. Substituting polluting fossil fuels with hydrogen — which emits water only when burned – could significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and stave off climate change.

Although hydrogen is a very low-carbon energy, it does not exist naturally on earth and is mainly produced from a range of more or less environmentally friendly chemical sources and processes. There are commonly three types of hydrogen: grey, blue and green.

• Grey hydrogen is produced by chemical reactions – steam methane reforming and coal gasification – and by the use of carbon-intensive fossil fuels (natural gas, oil and coal).
• Blue hydrogen is produced the same way as grey hydrogen, but the main difference is that it has a lower carbon footprint. This is because hydrogen uses carbon capture technologies that prevent the release of CO2 and allow the captured carbon to be stored and reused in industrial processes. Blue hydrogen is more expensive than grey hydrogen.
• Green hydrogen is produced by the electrolysis of water, which uses an electric current to break apart water molecules (H2O) into hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2). If the electrolysis is realized using renewable electricity (solar PV or offshore wind turbines), the resulting hydrogen is the cleanest variety, producing zero carbon emissions.

The global hydrogen production is dominated by grey hydrogen: according to the International Energy Agency (IEA), 96% of the hydrogen manufactured in the world is “grey”, while less than 0.1% is produced by water electrolysis. This is mainly due to the lower price of grey hydrogen production compared to blue and green hydrogen. The IEA estimates the price of grey hydrogen at around €1.50 per kilo – the main cause being the price of fossil fuels – and between €3.50 and €5 per kilo for green hydrogen. The three most critical factors for the high cost of green hydrogen are 1) the limited and costly capacity of electrolysis at the moment, 2) the high price of green electricity used in the electrolysis process and 3) the costs for safe and clean transportation.

The widespread adoption of green hydrogen remains extremely slow, but the future of clean H2 could be bright. Major players are taking action to stimulate R&D around green hydrogen production, transportation and industrial applications. The European Commission, for instance, strongly believes in the prospective use of green hydrogen to decarbonize heavy industries and transportation, as demonstrated by the adoption of the European Green Deal in January 2020 to support innovation in clean hydrogen and low-carbon resources. The Covid-19 crisis has introduced a new impetus: France and Germany plan to collaborate and invest €7bn and €9bn respectively in green hydrogen R&D projects. Large corporate companies, including Shell, Airbus and Chevron, are also seizing the opportunity to invest in clean hydrogen technologies and applications.

The market is still extremely young, and there is still room for progress. Startups are positioning themselves either in the improvement of hydrogen storage, transportation and distribution, or in the development of new applications (fuel cells for vehicles, industrial use cases), or in the development of new alternatives for H2 production and electrolysis methods (such as alkaline, Polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) or solid oxide electrolysis)

Process mining, neo-ERPs… – How can Artificial Intelligence power the next level of enterprise process automation?

IT Enterprise process automation is not something new: it began in the 1960s with the automation of white-collar work made possible by the invention of computers. Since then, the global adoption of digital technologies has transformed business process management through the integration of ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) and other applications, but has stagnated at the basic level of screen scraping and data collection.

Enterprise automation now refers to any technology by which a manual process or procedure is performed with minimal assistance – the goal being to optimize the level of human interaction by making machines perform the repetitive manual tasks. Automatable tasks and processes exist across all business functions (Sales, Logistics, Accounting, etc.) with different levels of complexity and power of automation. Some repetitive and rule-based tasks require only basic automation while more complex and interactive tasks require AI-powered automation.

In fact, the most advanced Robotic Process Automation (RPA) systems can only automate repetitive tasks, that account for 10% to 20% of business processes. The increasing advances of Artificial Intelligence (machine learning and deep learning systems, Natural Language Processing, image analysis and predictive analytics), Internet of Things and Blockchain could take automation to the next level by creating new possibilities and benefits for enterprise automation: a next generation of neo-ERP players is emerging, challenging traditional players.

Those challengers focus on providing three types of services:

• Detecting automatable processes with digital twins and process mining tools: companies need to understand their underlying processes in order to optimize them and find opportunities to improve efficiency. In particular, process mining tools could identify trends and patterns to analyze process optimization performances.
• Automating business processes with cognitive automation tools: every company collects a large volume of raw data that needs to be structured into actionable information to be relevant. Cognitive automation tools could bring a high level of automation with better KPIs across the different business functions.
• Integrating with workflow automation solutions, which includes all automated processes in the different business functions. Integration solutions (iPaaS or cloud-based integration softwares) are particularly interesting for companies that do not wish to build in-house tools.

Enterprise automation looks promising on paper. Yet, the transition remains bumpy as integrated automation applications are still expensive and difficult to implement  – it could take several years before complex automation tools are fully adopted. In particular, the emerging adoption of full automation in SaaS (at the expense of on-premise softwares) is questionable in terms of financial management (subscription based models) and cybersecurity. It is essential to balance the need for increased process management and the impact of full SaaS on the enterprise’s IT environment.

Nevertheless, the Covid-19 outbreak has urged corporates to adopt digital tools to enable business continuity and remote work. According to Appdynamics, 81% of IT leaders state that Covid-19 has created the greatest technology pressure their organization has ever faced. For this reason, the current situation could first trigger the adoption of detection tools (process mining and digital twins), that could lead to more automation.

2 Key Figures

255 process automation startups

in the world, according to Startup Insights

Market size expected to reach $12.6bn by 2023

According to Markets and Markets, the global digital process automation market size was valued at $6.8bn in 2018 and is expected to reach $12.6bn by 2023.

3 startups to draw inspiration from

This week, we identified three startups that we can draw inspiration from: Logpickr, Hypatos & Celigo.

Logpickr

Logpickr is a French startup that combines Process Mining with Artificial intelligence to provide smart business process analysis and optimization.

Hypatus

Hypatos is a German process automation startup that applies natural language processing and deep learning to speed up document processing for financial functions.

Celigo

Based in the US, Celigo creates an iPaaS integration platform that allows cloud-based applications to work together both for IT and business users.

123Fab #17

1 topic, 2 key figures, 3 startups to draw inspiration from

The slow adoption of robotics in Construction

Back in 1987, Japanese academics, robot manufacturers and contractors were already working on the first documented research about automated construction processes. Since then, construction robotics never stopped improving. ‘Robotics’ refers to the use of machines that have an automated component: construction robots are designed to help and assist humans in their day-to-day work on construction sites. The most common construction robots are stand-alone, fixed machines used for repetitive and precise applications (e.g. articulated arms). Then, there are collaborative robots (or cobots) that directly interact with human workers and perform a specific task – such as lifting heavy loads. A third type of robots are exoskeletons which are connected to the human body to support them in difficult tasks (e.g. for heavy-duty). Finally, the autonomous guided vehicles and autonomous mobile robots can navigate either onboard (e.g. camera or laser based) or in external environments (e.g. drones).

A good example of cobot is SAM (Semi-Automated Mason), the bricklaying robot designed by Construction Robotics. SAM works alongside the mason and assists him/her with the repetitive and arduous lifting and placing of bricks. The mason remains in charge of the setup and responsible for final quality. SAMs can lay 250 to 300 bricks per hour, improving by up to 4 times the number of bricks than a man could lay when working alone. With a retail price of $500,000, the firm that SAMs users can expect an ROI within three years, thanks to a reduction of labor costs by at least 30%, low maintenance costs and an expected lifespan of about 10 years.

Construction Robotics are not the only ones coming with an attractive value proposition for construction firms. Robotics companies and start-ups put forward financial benefits, productivity gain and safety as the main commercial arguments. Indeed, labor costs usually represent between 20% and 50% of a construction project total cost – and 38% of it could be automated according to a McKinsey study, leading to a potential cost saving of 20%.  Although the initial investment is high, robotics firms claim that in the long-term, it is more cost-effective to purchase robots: in the United States, the average robot cost (including maintenance) is 4 times lower than labor wage stated McKinsey. Moreover, robotics is a guarantee of accuracy. Its work is extremely precise and predictable, thus meeting deadlines and avoiding delay expenses is easier. Another advantage of robotics is the minimization of injuries and providing a safer workplace. For instance, autonomous vehicles can operate independently in hazardous areas.

However, robotics in construction is still not widely adopted and there is under-automated when compared to other manufacturing industries. The construction industry has been classified by McKinsey as « in middle range for automation ». There are several reasons for slow adoption rate of robotics in this industry:

• The complexity of construction sites – unique end-product, unpredictable weather –   leads to non-repetitive tasks and involving judgement
• The unpredictable and ever-changing environment: the flexibility required for construction works is for still difficult to automate. As previously said, only 38% of the time spent on unpredictable physical work in construction could be automated with current technologies compared to a 70% for predictable physical work (e.g. in automotive).
• The need for technology to improve: although there are plenty of promising innovations, improvements of the current technology are needed in the adaptability to real-time variability. Moreover, on construction sites there are hundreds of tasks and multiple phases. As there is no multitask-programmed robot, many construction firms remain reluctant to integrate robots to their regular activities.
• The significant investment costs: Investing in robotics involves high initial capital investment, including R&D. Although in the long term it is said to be beneficial, it remains an obstacle for many companies.
• Legal and safety issues: even though robots should reduce the risks on construction sites, the appropriate allocation of risk is a concern for all the construction participants. There is a need specific regulation in the use of robotics on sites. This issue is starting to be addressed (e.g. the compulsory use of Building Information Models in UK since 2019). The cyber risk also needs to be considered.
• Jobs implications: If 40% of current construction jobs would be “at high risk” of automation by the 2030s, according to a 2018 PwC study, the transition will take some time and the major challenge for workers will be to not be replaced by robots but to learn to work side by side with them. A specificity of the construction industry is the importance of craftsmanship, that adds value to projects. Replacing all human workers by robots would mean taking away the quality-assessment aspect that current robots cannot provide. Thus, collaborative robots may be the most appropriate solution as they are designed to work alongside human counterparts instead of entirely replacing them. Cobots will contribute to improve productivity by carrying out tasks that would otherwise be considered busywork or for employees.

The current labor-shortage in construction – A 2019 survey by Associated General Contractors of America and AutoDesk reported that 80% of firms find it difficult to hire labor force – will surely weight into the scale of construction robotics rise. Thanks to 5G and other technology improvements, better connectivity will make it easier for multiple robots to co-operate and better understand the environment they are operating in. Compared to other heavy industries, job automation in construction is rather low but it is poised to increase faster than them in the coming decades. According to a PwC study, in the late 2020s, job automation potential in construction is 16% versus 19% on average for all industry sectors but the automation potential for construction in the mid-2030s is forecast to be 39% versus 30% for all sectors.

2 Key Figures

77 construction robotics startups

in the world, according to a Tracxn query.

Market size expected to reach $460M by 2026

According to Verified Market Research, the global Construction Robotics market size was valued at $212 Million in 2019 and is expected to reach $460 Million by 2026.

3 startups to draw inspiration from

This week, we identified three startups that we can draw inspiration from: Construction Robotics, Kewazo and SuitX.

Construction Robotics

New-York based company, Construction Robotics is dedicated to developing affordable, leading-edge robotics and automation equipment for the construction industry.

Kewazo

Based in Munich, Kewazo develops smart robotic elevators for industrial and construction sites  with focus on scaffolding. Kewazo solutions intend to improve construction logistics via data analysis and robotics.

SuitX

The US-based startup SuitX builds a robotic exoskeleton for medical and industrial markets, designed to reduce the amount of strain on the knees and quadriceps.

123Fab #16

1 topic, 2 key figures, 3 startups to draw inspiration from

NLP and NLU : from understanding to processing natural language

The increase in smart devices usage in all areas and industries, resulting in the rise of artificial intelligence and cloud-based solutions, have driven the progress and adoption in Natural Language Processing (NLP) technologies.

Natural Language Processing is a branch of artificial intelligence that uses machine learning algorithms to interpret and use spoken and written human language. These AI algorithms are able to analyze the utterance syntax and semantics to determine the meaning of human communications, and consequently allow to provide appropriate and comprehensive answers.

Some NLP algorithms only focus on determining what is literally said, which implies converting conversational text into structured data, but others are more sophisticated and powered with Natural Language Understanding (NLU). NLU is a major sub-topic of NLP that allows computing machines to understand the human language in all its complexity: besides semantic and syntax analysis, NLU involves a pragmatic analysis that enables machines to detect intent and sentiments in human utterances and some NLU solutions integrate noise analysis to better understand the context in which the text is captured. The powerful feature of reasoning and adaptive learning developed with NLU makes it possible for machines to determine precisely what the user is trying to achieve through each request, provide a complex answer and follow-up.

For instance, if my request is “I would like to book a flight from San Francisco to Paris on December 1st, 2020.”. The program will understand that my objective is to book a plane ticket from one location to another, with 3 query conditions: place of departure, place of arrival and date. The result should be a list of flights meeting the criteria. I could narrow the search by asking “Do you know if there is any direct flight with AirFrance?” to which the program should answer: “There is one direct flight with AirFrance from San Francisco to Paris departing at 3:15 and the lowest flight fare is €576.” To conclude, NLU algorithms are able to deal with several queries at the same time, but also engage in real and complex conversational back and forth with the users (which is usually very limited with current voice assistants and chatbots).

NLP and NLU technologies are developing rapidly thanks to the increasing awareness about the advantages and benefits of human-to-machine communication and sentiment analysis in several sectors, including healthcare, industry, mobility and customer services. Yet, real-life applications remain very limited: AI algorithms are still facing difficulties in fully capturing and understanding human languages. The technology has not fully reached its expected potential, but the market is already very dense with large companies and emerging startups competing to develop the most viable and effective NLP solution.

2 Key Figures

398 NLP startups

received funding for a total amount of $3.3bn according to a Crunchbase query.

Market size expected to reach $26.4bn by 2024

According to Markets and Markets, the global Natural Language Processing market size was valued at $10.2bn in 2019 and is expected to reach $26.4bn by 2024.

3 startups to draw inspiration from

This week, we identified three startups that we can draw inspiration from: Inbenta, Agamon, Logically.

Inbenta

Inbenta is a US-based startup that provides a comprehensive automated customer service solution powered by AI, machine learning and NLP.

Agamon

Based in the US, Agamon develops an AI-powered healthcare platform that converts clinical text into structured data, by using an advanced approach to NLU.

Logically

Logically is a UK-based startup that raised £2.5M in July 2020 to develop NLP technologies to fight against misinformation from fake news to state propaganda.